You're absolutely right about the content of the two being completely different: however, they are both very thought provoking without having to be overly flowery or "well written." Neither author seems to be concerned with impressing the reader. Neither writer is at all insecure with his ability or intelligence. The result is a story without a lot of normally-required crap for a reader to gag through. I would even go so far as to include "Notes >From Underground" in this group of "intellectual thought-provoking not-pretentious no-shit writing." - Adam In response to: Almost reminds me of Sartre. > - Adam > Really? that's cool. I would not really identify Teddy as a Sartre like story considering that Sartre's stories expose life in its raw, cold, and naked, and meaninglessness true form(in his view). I thought that Teddy was more based upon spirituality, the afterlife, etc...I hope you are catching my drift. Anyways, I'm glad that you mentioned Sartre because he is one of my favorite authors. -Liz Friedman