Yeah, I read a review of Hapworth when it was rumored to be released, and the critic made a similar statement about Saligner loving the Glass family too much. The only way I can make sense of it is through the story Teddy (who is supposed to be modeled on Seymour anyway). Teddy is an unusual adept and a very small child as well, and his clarity and intelligence is a sign of his spiritual advancement, of the age and purity of the soul he possesses. This is fine within the context of a belief system, but, well, there just aren't any real children I know like that :) Just makes it pretty hard to accept in fiction, esp. given that a clear basis for this unusual letter is made. Salinger should have given a nod very, very early on that this is an unusally intelligent letter for a child this age with some explanation. Jim ___________________________________________________________________ You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail. Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com/getjuno.html or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866]