I think that's an accurate depiction of Salinger's view of wisdom, but that's not the beef people seem to have had with Hapworth. An insightful, genuninely Wise Child isn't a problem with me, especially if said child works within a child's parameters. But what we see here is a child with a remarkable command of the English language. This in itself may not be damning to a work, but some explanation of it would have given the reader some reason to suspend disbelief early on and, at least, helped me out a bit :) Jim >Well, I guess that drives a stake between your opinion on intelligence >and >mine (and MW's). If intelligence is how many dates of famous battles >you >can recite off by heart, how many times tables you can regurgitate, >how >many A's you can get on your report card - then obviously the person >who >has lived longer has the more information at his or her disposal. >However, >true wisdom - that is, the state of being Wise (heck, `It's a Wise >Child'!) >is something that I believe certain people are born with, an >intangible >which cannot be eroded or changed from birth but just covered or >uncovered. >I think this is the sort of intelligence Salinger intended us to >believe >Seymour has - however, the innate difficulty in portraying such a hazy >value seems to have led him to plump for a more `worldly' wiseness for >Seymour. > >Camille >verona_beach@geocities.com >@ THE ARTS HOLE http://www.geocities.com/Hollywood/Theater/6442 >@ THE INVERTED FOREST http://www.angelfire.com/pa/invertedforest > ___________________________________________________________________ You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail. Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com/getjuno.html or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866]