In a message dated 97-11-15 04:16:23 EST, you write: << > Hey, about the No Quoting rule...does that even apply to brief quotations > from texts to illustrate points? Just curious. Brief quotations are not a problem; however, as the Ian Hamilton biography of Salinger demonstrated, it's pretty hard to define what is reasonable in a quotation. And we've seen that Salinger's lawyers are pretty tenacious about protecting the writer's work. (Quite properly, I say.) >> Thanks for the welcome :) I kinda suspected the rule applied to posting complete works, but wanted to make sure. It's great hearing about Pynchon a bit on the list. I've been reading _Mason and Dixon_, and think it's one of his best (but I have V and GR on my shelf and haven't read them yet...I started V, but haven't finished it). There's a couple spots where it seems like a string of short stories, the way each chapter seems self contained, but I think that's a strength in a novel that long too. Someone really thought Salinger and Pynchon were the same person? You're kidding, right? :) They both have the ability to wrap their writing styles around a number of different voices, but the voices they create are totally different, and Pynchon's humor seems a lot more ribald than Salinger's, and his tone seems less serious overall (it's like he keeps his tongue planted firmly in cheek most of the time, and pulls it out for a serious aside occasionally, letting you in on the secret that his humor was serious all along...). Jim