---"D." <darjr@shore.net> wrote: > > At 04:39 PM 10/28/98 -0800, you wrote: > >First Matt wrote: > > > >>> We are the literary representatives of Ayn Rand. Please be advised > >>that > >>> discussion of Ayn Rand is expressly forbidden on this list, which is > >>> designed by and for decent people. Be further advised that > >>acquirement, > >>> enjoyment, endorsement, and other forms of propogation of Mrs. Rand's > >>> pamphlets and/or ideas is prohibited in the name of aesthetic, > >>> philosophical, political and social integrity. Personal copies of of > >>> Mrs. Rand's works retained for documentary purposes are to be stored > >>in > >>> the freezer. And know yet further that scorn and vituperation sit > >>like > >>> heavy fog on the censorious brows of the ethereal, electronic > >>> etherpowers who stand watch over this list and others like it and who > >>> themselves will not hear tell especially of _The Fountainhead_. > >>> > >>> Matt Kozusko mkozusko@parallel.park.uga.edu > >>> > > > >Then Liz retorted: > >>Okay, who gives you the right to determine what people should or > >>should not read? I don't care that you hate The Fountainhead but I > >>like it a lot. I am not an objectionist or anything like that I just > >>thought that it was a good story. Just like I love Salinger's stories > >>because they are great stories. I don't really care about the > >>religious meanings of them. People tend to > >>get so involved in the writer's beleifs or the symbolism of the story > >>that they forget about the story itself. > >>-Liz Friedman > > > >THEN D. threw in 2 cents: > >I just thought Matt's post was hysterical. Having seen the Modern > >Library > >readers' poll back when they had that Web page open to reader voting, > >there's obviously something mildly intense about Rand's > >readership--seemingly on the same level as some religious fanaticism. > >However, I've not read a word of Rand, and this sort of intensity makes > >me > >wonder if I should check out Rand just to see what all the fuss is about > >or > >just ignore her as some Jim Jones 20th Century Literary figure. > > > > > >My $0.02 worth, > > > > D. > > > >Now Thor interjects: > > > >Well, I think you SHOULD check out Ayn Rand. It has it's flaws, but her > >books and philosophy are compelling nonetheless. Even if you can't > >subscribe to her way of thinking, it's worth considering her > >perspective. As for fanatacism, well, I think there are more than 2 > >self-procliamned Salinger addicts here, & he's got something worth > >saying. In other words, like they used to say about Bridgette Bardot: > >"fifty thousand Frenchmen can't be wrong". If Rand is still causing a > >stir, there must be SOMETHING to it, eh? > > > >Namaste, > > > >Thor > > > Well now D. responds: > > Well, to be honest, fanaticism is not the exclusive domain of Rand or > Salinger fans, but the *level* of Rand fanhood fanaticism seems higher than > I've seen with any writer, and this includes Salinger and Pynchon (and > others). Of course, with this intense of a following, I am inherently > suspicious. Why banter about so intensely about a writer to get others to > see his/her worth whether in terms of writing ability or ideology? That > which is certain doesn't need such fanaticism. You don't usually hear of > people trying to convince others that the sun will rise in the East. Rand's > fans obviously sat there with their browsing a-blinking and their mice > a-clicking to get those vote totals up there on top of the ML readers poll. > And I wondered why. No other fans voted with such dedication. Maybe > Rand's books and ideas are compelling, but for *that* kind of fanaticism? > I e-mailed a very prominent Literary scholar whose specialty is American > Lit and he professed to be in the same boat as I--never read any Rand and > wonders what all the fuss is about. And while Rand may have some nuggets > in her works, I can't help but wary of such ardent dedication. So maybe > one day when the "to read" pile dwindles and the demands of parenthood > lessen some for me, I will *consider* finding out what the fuss is all > about? Until then, I just keeping wondering.... > > > An additional $0.02 > > > D. > > Well I never was aware of the fanaticism you talk about. I just felt that Fountainhead was a great book and I enjoyed it. I don't care about votes I just read what I like. -Liz Friedman > > _________________________________________________________ DO YOU YAHOO!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com