Morgan quoted Sean: > In a far-off land still relatively unspoiled by western influence, a wise > monk carrying two sacks approaches his pupil. > > "In one of these sacks", says the monk, "are 10 white balls. In the other > sack are 10 black balls. Never mind where I got them. I will randomly draw a > ball from one of the sacks. If it is white, you will be enlightened. If it > is black, you will remain forever in the dark." > > "Before I draw a ball, I will turn my back, during which time you may change > the contents of the sacks by moving balls from sack to sack. When you are > done, however, there must still be 10 white and 10 black balls total between > the two sacks." > > Is there any way for the pupil to increases his chances of seeing the light? and added: > This sounds more like a math problem than a koan...this is suppose to stop > making you think rationally? I'm a little confused. Actually, this riddle is not solved mathematically at all, but by applying a bit of "sideways" thinking, not non-rational but re-examining the ambiguous meaning of one of the words. Not, to my mind, a spiritual awakening, yet an exercise in creative thinking. The answer to the riddle of course is: yes. Now if you want to know how... I'll let the poser decide whether or not to reveal that. all the best, Mattis