Re: Franny and Zooey

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Tim O'Connor: "(no subject)"
• Previous message: sigal ilan: "(no subject)"
• Maybe in reply to: LeeAnn Bryska Magner: "Franny and Zooey"
• Next in thread: Sproutt18@aol.com: "Re: Franny and Zooey"

On Mon, 9 Nov 1998, akemi deherrera wrote:

> Yes, I second this notion/motion whatever.  Let's talk about f&Z.
> akemi
> 
> On Mon, 9 Nov 1998, LeeAnn Bryska Magner wrote:
> 
> > We are currently studying JDS' Franny and Zooey and I feel that these are
> > powerfully deep stories. Could this list possibly discuss some thoughts on
> > what is really happening in these stories and digress from Chapman,
> > Kerouac, and Shakespeare for a couple of days?

akemi & leeann:

what specifically would you like to  discuss?

[ might i also ask that when discussing these stories, you try to keep the
subject lines very specific to the content of the post? that way i can
killfile anything that involves a discussion of pr*gnancy. ;) ]

                                         :helena kim

                     helena at netsoc dot tcd dot ie
           'the church is near, but the road is icy.
         the bar is far, but i will walk carefully.'
                                   - russian proverb

• Next message: Tim O'Connor: "(no subject)"
• Previous message: sigal ilan: "(no subject)"
• Maybe in reply to: LeeAnn Bryska Magner: "Franny and Zooey"
• Next in thread: Sproutt18@aol.com: "Re: Franny and Zooey"