Even asides are fair game. If you're solely concerned with _Catcher_'s influence on later authors, maybe a passing mention of it might suffice, but for anything deeper, I would at least recommend a reread just to make sure that the students have read the book in terms of something more meaningful than an 8th grade book report; maybe not studying the book intensively, but at least treating it as a work of literature and not grouping it with so-called "young-adult novels" as some [bad] classes seem to treat it. At 12:46 11/11/98 +0000, helena kim wrote: >as an aside, catcher defintely was one of the most influential books of >the period, and should be referenced. but would it be safe for the >professor >to assume that everyone studying english in college has read it, and >instead of *teaching* it, just comment on how it influenced what came >afterwards? i'm wondering what our resident english academics think of >this. ________________________________________________________ G.H.G.A.Paterson (804)662-3737 gpaterso@richmond.edu ________________________________________________________