Re: SAMLA I AMLA

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: john v. omlor: "Re: SAMLA I AMLA"
• Previous message: Matt Kozusko: "SAMLA I AMLA"
• Maybe in reply to: Matt Kozusko: "SAMLA I AMLA"
• Next in thread: john v. omlor: "Re: SAMLA I AMLA"

Has this group shared commentary regarding Maynard's book? I see that
several of us have made mention of her, but I have not seen responses to
her "insights" about jds. I read a scathing review of both her as a
person adn her book in "Slate," an on-line journal. I think the reviewer
worked with maynard at the new yorker.  He basically depicts her as a
self-imposed victim--a naricissist. 

i just finished the book and I want to know if others have read it too
(i am new, so if this matter has been addressed, please forgive, and
refer me to the archives). 

has the subject of maynard  been tabooed for on line discussion? 
-- 
M.E. Pierce
Dept. of English/ SFASU
http://titan.sfasu.edu/~f_pierceme
"and gladly would he lerne, and gladly teche." Chaucer

• Next message: john v. omlor: "Re: SAMLA I AMLA"
• Previous message: Matt Kozusko: "SAMLA I AMLA"
• Maybe in reply to: Matt Kozusko: "SAMLA I AMLA"
• Next in thread: john v. omlor: "Re: SAMLA I AMLA"