I don't think I share this feeling of wanting to know everything about the author when I am affected by a literary work. I mean, I guess I'm curious about some things, but I don't know how much they matter (to me or to my interpretation of the work). Especially in the case of Salinger, I think it's more fun to guess what his life was like. I mean, if his life was that interesting in and of itself, well, he probably would've just written a straight autobiography or something, like Frank McCourt. But I think Salinger writes to write. I don't doubt that he puts himself and his experiences into his writing--I mean, he MUST, his writings are HIM--but I don't think it's the him he wants to focus on, but the possible meanings or interpretations of what it is to live in a world he has created for himself. At least that's what I get out of it. But another reason I have no interest in Maynard's book is because I saw her on the Today show, and I'm telling you, I wouldn't have an interest in reading her obituary. I mean, not that I wish her ill, but I just think that even she has trouble justifying her reasons for writing that book. I don't know. It just seems like such a disservice. ______________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com