Re: The Mantra of Michael

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Camille Scaysbrook: "Re: Poo-Poo to Author's Intent"
• Previous message: Camille Scaysbrook: "Re: the road to hell"
• Maybe in reply to: Erin McLaughlin: "The Mantra of Michael"
• Next in thread: J J R: "Re: The Mantra of Michael"

> This isn't a debate it is a shouting contest. Goodbye.  

If you're still there - please know the difference between an argument and
a discussion. As I see it, you argue when you know you're right. You
discuss when you think you're right but you're willing to entertain other
options. Arguments are tedious and unproductive. Discussions are enriching
and educational. You may even learn something if you're willing to see the
other side of the debate, whether you agree with it or not.

Camille
verona_beach@geocities.com
@ THE ARTS HOLE www.geocities.com/Hollywood/Theater/6442
@ THE INVERTED FOREST www.angelfire.com/pa/invertedforest

• Next message: Camille Scaysbrook: "Re: Poo-Poo to Author's Intent"
• Previous message: Camille Scaysbrook: "Re: the road to hell"
• Maybe in reply to: Erin McLaughlin: "The Mantra of Michael"
• Next in thread: J J R: "Re: The Mantra of Michael"