Re: Too freakin' freaky

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Laughing Man: "our water nymph"
• Previous message: Camille Scaysbrook: "Re: Too freakin' freaky"
• Maybe in reply to: Camille Scaysbrook: "Too freakin' freaky"
• Next in thread: AntiUtopia@aol.com: "Re: Too freakin' freaky"

Jason, 
That would be a major infringement - you would have to purchase the rights
to modify the work, according to copyright laws.  Any alteration to a
copyrighted work, reprinting of a copyrighted work, etc. is against the
law.  Warhol either bought the rights, took the picture himself, or got
really lucky when no one sued him.

-Sarah

----------
> > BTW: does anyone know the copyright laws dealing with taking someone
> > else's work and making major modifications to it?  For example: you know
> > that Andy Warhol picture of Maryland Monroe?  If he didn't shoot the
> > original photo, but just colored it and made prints, is it copyright
> > infrindgement?

• Next message: Laughing Man: "our water nymph"
• Previous message: Camille Scaysbrook: "Re: Too freakin' freaky"
• Maybe in reply to: Camille Scaysbrook: "Too freakin' freaky"
• Next in thread: AntiUtopia@aol.com: "Re: Too freakin' freaky"