Re: Honeymoon?


Subject: Re: Honeymoon?
From: Scottie Bowman (rbowman@indigo.ie)
Date: Wed Oct 11 2000 - 03:45:22 GMT


    When Muriel says: 'We couldn't get the room we had
    before the war', & adds: 'The people are awful this year',
    she's surely removing any doubt about honeymoons.

    'Before the war' means - for Americans, if not for the rest
    of us - before December 1941.

    Girls belonging to anything other than the 'very rich'
    stratum of American society did NOT - in the early 40s -
    go away for holidays or dirty weekends with their lovers;
    at least not so openly as to discuss it with their mothers.

    _______________
    
    And you know what? Taking this my sixth? -
    seventh? - look at the story, I've finally decided it's
    a truly nasty, pretentious little piece of work.

    Seymour identifies the root of his discontent when he
    'look[s] at the girl, aim[s] the pistol & fire[s] ...'

    Nothing to do with the higher spirituality. It's all
    Muriel's fault: this dishy, affectionate girl, who defends
    him from her parents (guilty of nothing more than
    worrying, quite justifiably, about their daughter's
    involvement with a glaring psychotic), who sticks up
    for him, accepts with good humour his verbal abuse,
    listens patiently to his undergraduate crap about Rilko
    Bilko, & puts up generally with his nonsense FOR AT
    LEAST FOUR YEARS when so many others would
    have long gone....

    No no, she ain't good enough for this disgruntled,
    precious, self-important, inadequate, paedophiliac
    prig with his wearisome claims to intellectual
    superiority.

    Good riddance.

    Scottie B.
    

-
* Unsubscribing? Mail majordomo@roughdraft.org with the message
* UNSUBSCRIBE BANANAFISH



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b25 : Wed Nov 08 2000 - 17:43:40 GMT