Subject: the hobgoblin of mean minds
From: Scottie Bowman (rbowman@indigo.ie)
Date: Thu Oct 12 2000 - 04:35:18 GMT
'... Same name, different bloke ...'
'... now what do you mean by that? ...'
The same thing, I believe, as others when they write
about the dangers of trying to make all the components
of the Glass saga consistent with each other.
I'm unfamiliar with the chronology of their publication
but the different stories must have emerged over quite
a period of time. I suspect that Salinger has had a number
- perhaps, like many writers,quite a small number - of core
ideas, personalities, themes, to which he has to return
repeatedly to capture them with ever greater clarity.
If they are vital enough to give life to a body of work,
they will also have the tendency to develop & change between
his visits. The artist himself is developing - so that one is left
then with quite a fluid picture - maturing ideas being worked
on by a maturing writer.
The underlying themes may remain essentially unchanged:
the inexplicable suicide, the eccentrically gifted family, the saving
grace of the innocent child, & so on. But new aspects & truths
will have emerged after twenty years so that the later versions can
only be cramped & shackled by attempts to make them fit all
the given details of the earlier.
I doubt if the artist is as concerned with making his creation
consistent as, say, the scholar-detective in finding oversights
& incoherencies. He is too excited by his latest insight.
Scottie B.
-
* Unsubscribing? Mail majordomo@roughdraft.org with the message
* UNSUBSCRIBE BANANAFISH
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b25 : Wed Nov 08 2000 - 17:43:40 GMT