There were some comments about whether or not we should tear apart Salinger's work. I am still a bit undecided. On one hand, I think the only really "pure" way to enjoy a piece of fiction is to take it as it is, to get wrapped up in it like it's another little world, and the best writers are utterly convincing in that respect, so that when the story ends, it takes you a second to readjust and you realize that you've been holding your breath. It sounds really sappy, but that's what I like so much about Salinger, all the little details and the endearing characters (I don't even think of them as characters but more as real people) that he has. On the other hand, I can't say that it is less legitimate to discuss your interpretation of his work with other people, since it is so significant. Somehow, I just think that discussion and analysis takes something away from that hold-your-breath kind of absorption that his work offers. Hey, I just got an unrelated but cool thought. I've heard that he's been writing for the last 20 years. Just imagine all those stories sitting there. Whatever his reasons for not publishing them, I hope I get to see them in my lifetime.