Re: no news

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: randy royal: "what to read (was Re: access to news)"
• Previous message: helena spice: "phoebe"

>I mean, if one is simply there to absorb
>as much knowledge as one can so that they'll make incrementally more 
money
>at a job once they leave college, and have to sacrifice their knowledge 
of
>the tectonic shifts in the zeitgeist of culture for 4, 5, 8, ten years 
until
>they're out of college and "have the time"...you'll be in for a helluva
>shock.

might as well jump out of that window right now, eh kids?

>if i did have the time to watch the
>news, i would spend it reading salinger or whitman or hemingway or
>somebody else which would feed my soul a lot more than whatever crappy
>thing happened to people today. i guess it comes down to a matter of 
values, which, while not
>arbitrary, are not constructive fair game for arbitration.--matt

THANK YOU. well put.               emily

______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com

• Next message: randy royal: "what to read (was Re: access to news)"
• Previous message: helena spice: "phoebe"