didn't mean to imply otherwise, will. just making a wry comment on the "negative idiocy" people sometimes fall into. and why does the list keep saying i'm this kathy dexter person? i am not kathy dexter and moreover, have no idea who is kathy dexter. the one and only...matt On Mon, 27 Oct 1997 10:35:04 -0700 (MST) hochman@uscolo.edu (WILL HOCHMAN) wrote: >but the thing of it is that catcher doesn't need banning to "stick >around"--it's a book that will be read for centuries because of much >more >than negative idiocy...will > >On Sun, 26 Oct 1997, Kathy Dexter wrote: > >> it seems that any book that gets widely banned sticks around for >quite >> awhile. so maybe catcher will be around as long as tom sawyer... >> also, one of my english profs made mention to a story that jd wrote >last >> year or about that time and said it was about a sailor. anyone know >> anything more? >> finally cool enough to wear flannel in waco, tx.--matt >> >>