Re: PLATO

Matthew_Stevenson@baylor.edu
Mon, 27 Oct 1997 13:09:14 -0600

didn't mean to imply otherwise, will.  just making a wry comment on the
"negative idiocy" people sometimes fall into.  and why does the list
keep saying i'm this kathy dexter person?  i am not kathy dexter and
moreover, have no idea who is kathy dexter.  the one and only...matt

On Mon, 27 Oct 1997 10:35:04 -0700 (MST) hochman@uscolo.edu (WILL
HOCHMAN) wrote:

>but the thing of it is that catcher doesn't need banning to "stick
>around"--it's a book that will be read for centuries because of much
>more
>than negative idiocy...will
>
>On Sun, 26 Oct 1997, Kathy Dexter wrote:
>
>> it seems that any book that gets widely banned sticks around for
>quite
>> awhile.  so maybe catcher will be around as long as tom sawyer...
>> also, one of my english profs made mention to a story that jd wrote
>last
>> year or about that time and said it was about a sailor.  anyone know
>> anything more?
>> finally cool enough to wear flannel in waco, tx.--matt
>>
>>