> If I wanted to read something and not get involved in the writer's > beliefs (and my own beliefs, for that matter) or the symbolism of the > story, I'd probably try the comics. Or maybe I'd go to a movie just to > get a story for the story's sake. To me, it's a difference between > education and entertainment. And I think I can say this without being > TOO wrong, but reading without actively participating in what we read > isn't really reading at all. I suppose what the big deal here is is that Rand has a way of preaching her own beliefs through her fiction. This is a method of writing I particularly dislike - pedantry disguised as story, as demonstrated in the Celestine Prophecy and Sophie's World. But ultimately I think the quality of the writing should be the determining factor, if we are able to put aside for a minute the prejudices of the writer - again I cite the example of DW Griffith's `Birth of a Nation'. Camille verona_beach@geocities.com @ THE ARTS HOLE www.geocities.com/Hollywood/Theater/6442 @ THE INVERTED FOREST www.angelfire.com/pa/invertedforest