When a person reads literature, I feel that it's better not to 'read as an adult or child' for that matter. One should be open to all ideas and messages without the hinderence of personal bias. I, as well, have known people to not like TCITR because they see a sort of 'stereotyping' of teenagers. I personally disagree with this accusation in that I don't feel that Salinger was attempting to mock or depict stereotypical actions of teenagers. To me it seemed as if he was trying to avoid those kinds of accusations more than anything else. I feel that he captured one Holden Cauffield's account of a few days in NYC wonderfully without suggesting any 'typical' actions of a teenager. Sarah ---------- I was talking to my friend today and oddly enough the topic of JD Salinger came up. She said she was in her AP English class and her teacher struck up a conversation about JD Salinger and his works. She then proceeded to ask me why I had such an interest in his stories. I guess her teacher was telling the class that she hated Salinger because she felt that in he started or atleast furthered a negative stereotype about teenagers. (Catcher) I figure she must have missed the point of the story or read it as an adult with little understanding of teenage feelings/thoughts. Also, it's totally ridiculous to base your whole opinion of an author on one work, she's a teacher she's suppose to know better. Just wondering what you guys thought about this. I've never heard this particular view point before. Morgan