Re: holy figgledischnucks

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Sean Draine: "RE: view point"
• Previous message: J J R: "Re: holy figgledischnucks"
• Maybe in reply to: Sean Draine: "holy figgledischnucks"
• Next in thread: Erin McLaughlin: "Re: holy figgledischnucks"

> If agnosticism is really grounded in avoiding the logical pitfalls of
> universal negation, then agnostics must also entertain the possible
> existence of unicorns, Hercules, Munchkins, and of course our
beloved Santa
> Claus. That's not to mention figgledischnucks, lapsteins,
bhygghnnudts, and
> any other creatures I might invent on the fly. Anyone who answers "I
don't
> know" to the question "Do figgledischnucks exist?" is just being
silly as
> far as I'm concerned. And, I guess I'm not sure what the difference is
> between theories of God's existence and theories of the existence of
> figgledischnucks.
> 
> -Sean
> 
> I agree Sean. When I was a small child I believed in God, but I also
believed in witches, goblins, ghosts, fairys, and elves. 
-Liz Friedman
_________________________________________________________
DO YOU YAHOO!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com

• Next message: Sean Draine: "RE: view point"
• Previous message: J J R: "Re: holy figgledischnucks"
• Maybe in reply to: Sean Draine: "holy figgledischnucks"
• Next in thread: Erin McLaughlin: "Re: holy figgledischnucks"