Re: Ramblings of Randroids

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: WILL HOCHMAN: "Re: Teddy, reincarnation, vedantic/buddhist angles. . ."
• Previous message: Brian Flanigan: "Re: Hapworth?"
• Maybe in reply to: Matt Kozusko: "Ramblings of Randroids"
• Next in thread: Camille Scaysbrook: "Re: Ramblings of Randroids"

---J J R <jrovira@juno.com> wrote:
>
> heh :)  
> 
> Knew that'd get a rise.  mmm....
> 
> Do I want to pursue this or not?  It'd take reading Rand again.
> 
> I'll just say that if a male author had presented women the way Rand
did,
> I think you wouldn't be arguing with the charge of misogynist.  
> 
> Jim

>I don't know about that. I mean people say that Hemingway portrayed
his women characters poorly, but even so I still love his work
-Liz Friedman
_________________________________________________________
DO YOU YAHOO!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com

• Next message: WILL HOCHMAN: "Re: Teddy, reincarnation, vedantic/buddhist angles. . ."
• Previous message: Brian Flanigan: "Re: Hapworth?"
• Maybe in reply to: Matt Kozusko: "Ramblings of Randroids"
• Next in thread: Camille Scaysbrook: "Re: Ramblings of Randroids"