Will's review


Subject: Will's review
From: Scottie Bowman (rbowman@indigo.ie)
Date: Wed Sep 20 2000 - 02:42:58 GMT


    This is a strong plea to the Cardinal to circulate
    his review of Margaret Salinger's book on the list
    & not limit it to a 'need-to-know' basis.

    I should probably hold off comment until my reading
    of the book extends beyond the long extracts that have
    appeared in the British press. Nonetheless, I really have
    to commend to everyone's attention Will's article as a
    perceptive, generous-minded & elegant piece of writing.

    The problem that Will addresses remains: what bearing
    does the revelation of a distorted life & personality have
    on the value we attach to the 'art' produced by that life?

    For me, the problem can be evaded in Salinger's case since
    the post-Caulfield stuff seems poor anyway. After my first
    thrilled enthusiasm - greatly stimulated by the hype that
    accompanied their appearance (wild reviews, TIME cover,
    etc., etc.) - I became quickly skunnered ** by the ''look-at-
    me-I'm-incredibly-rareified-in-my-mystical-perceptions''
    preciousness that permeated everything. It was so far from
    the clean, high-precision engineering of Esme or The Catcher.
    Whatever went wrong after the war was evidently going
    badly wrong by the early '60s.

    So it came as no surprise then to read Margaret's account
    of her unlikeable father. Stuff like that could only proceed
    from someone in whom the heart had died.
 
    But what if, in 1970, he'd written Crime & Punishment?
    After all, there is that story of Dostoevsky abusing little girls.
    What about Beethoven's rage, or Wagner's treachery?
    The answer is, I think, that the great artist never really
    loses his AWARENESS - of himself in relation to
    the surrounding life &, not least, the awareness of his own
    failures within that relationship. That inner struggle
    with his own nature, with what the Christians would
    regard as his innate sinfulness, sits at the very heart of the work.

    The late Salinger seems only aware of a circumscribed world
    held tightly within his own anxious control. What we have
    heard so far is of a Salinger drowning in his own neuroses -
    & embracing them in the mistaken belief they're life jackets.

    ** A good Scots word to describe the sickliness induced by
    eating too much fudge.

    Scottie B.

-
* Unsubscribing? Mail majordomo@roughdraft.org with the message
* UNSUBSCRIBE BANANAFISH



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b25 : Sun Oct 01 2000 - 14:44:36 GMT