I think, coming from you, this is a bit different. You've apparently
already written and published at least one thing that you're very happy
with -- that'd you'd be proud to call yours, and even a masterpiece (I
believe it).
But if I followed your advice I'd be like a batter afraid to approach the
plate lest he didn't hit a home run every time. Maybe after you've hit
your home run (even a grad slam) and you see it's all downhill from there
you can hang up your bat.
Until then, though, it just kills you not to try ;).
There are other benefits for publishing less than masterpiece fiction.
Name recognition. A publishing résumé. Things that show publishing houses
and agents that you're a viable author...
Jim
Scottie Bowman wrote:
> Although a couple of my best bananafish chums managed
> to get hold of at least one of the books .... & although I'm
> told they've been offered second hand on the net for a hundred
> bucks .... & although they received the kind of reviews from
> the likes of Elizabeth Bowen & Claire Tomalin that you only
> ever dream about....
>
> ... nonetheless,
>
> ... in the light of what I'm now turning out, the thought of those
> damned books fills me with nothing but the most profound
> embarrassment & the hope they never again see the light of day.
>
> You see, I really DO mean it. If you can't write a masterpiece
> better not write anything less. Having produced both kinds,
> I can tell the difference - & know what I'm talking about.
>
> Scottie B.
>
> -
> * Unsubscribing? Mail majordomo@roughdraft.org with the message
> * UNSUBSCRIBE BANANAFISH
-
* Unsubscribing? Mail majordomo@roughdraft.org with the message
* UNSUBSCRIBE BANANAFISH
Received on Mon Sep 2 13:17:52 2002
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Aug 10 2003 - 20:51:45 EDT