>perhaps he simply gave up on fighting with the aristocracy, the >judicial system, and was disheartened by the public's cries for his >execution. but inside, i am sure that there was a part of him that, >while maybe not afraid of death, certainly wanted to "rage, >rage against the dying of the light." i'm sorry, but i just don't see death as "a dying of the light". i love the poem, don't get me wrong, but it's just a symbol to me. i think people can very easily have a passion for life and accept death at the same time. it may be foreign for most westerners, but everyone does not see death as an end at all - and don't just mean the typical idea of heaven. if this is only one plane of existance, which is a common belief worldwide, then there may be all kinds of "light" or "life" to experience. i'm not trying to go into my personal views on life after death, i'm only saying that there many different perceptions of, and therefore feelings about, life and death. i don't think it's fair to make such a generalization. >"rage is always deep inside, and no amount of acceptance > can mask that."