Funny how things tend to tie into one another isn't it. Two of the things I'm currently studying have Salinger implications, thusly: 1) Tarantino Yes *Tarantino* (: I've been intrigued about what Brad said about the influence of the construction of the Glass stories on `Pulp Fiction' and I only just realised another implication of this today. Tarantino often has his characters and locations pop up as cameos in each others' stories in a very Glass like manner. The world of his movies, like the world of the Glasses is a self contained, self referential one. Consider - Vincent Vega (Pulp Fiction), Vic Vega (Reservoir Dogs), an ad for the nostalgia restaurant in P.F. appears on the radio in R.D. , the never-quite-met-but-often-mentioned `Bonnie' is alluded to in *all* of his movies. Studies of the original scripts reveal even more links like this. 2) `Flaubert's Parrot' by Julian Barnes I'd already concluded that this book must have been influenced by Nabokov's `Pale Fire', but after reading this passage about the idea of a novel with two separate endings (p 89 of my edition, Picador 1985) I wonder if he hadn't read S:AI before too: `The novel with two endings doesn't reproduce this reality: it merely takes us down two diverging paths. It's a form of *cubism*, I suppose.' (my italics) (Anyone remember the discussion of Buddy Glass' `literary cubism'?) Consider also (as I just suddenly realised) that the literary discourse on which the book is based is ultimately revealed to be the narrator's dealing with the *suicide* of his wife! Camille verona_beach@geocities.com @ THE ARTS HOLE www.geocities.com/Hollywood/Theater/6442 THE INVERTED FOREST www.angelfire.com/pa/invertedforest