Re: further revelations

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Speirlow@aol.com: "Re: Introduction."
• Previous message: WILL HOCHMAN: "Re: D.B. Caulfield"
• Maybe in reply to: Scottie Bowman: "further revelations"
• Next in thread: JDHadden@aol.com: "Re: further revelations"

I like Hem's stories best--but don't believe one bit that mr. salinger's
muse is as reclusive as he is--but that's an issue of faith and yet, his
second to last piece, "Seymour--An Introduction" is one of his finest
works IMHO, so I don't think that "hapworth" is enough evidence to say he
wasn't/isn't writing now "because all your stars are out, and for no other
reason."  Sorry, but just because I'm not reading new pages, I'm not
convinced there's nothing more of interest on his desk...will

• Next message: Speirlow@aol.com: "Re: Introduction."
• Previous message: WILL HOCHMAN: "Re: D.B. Caulfield"
• Maybe in reply to: Scottie Bowman: "further revelations"
• Next in thread: JDHadden@aol.com: "Re: further revelations"