Re: My political career

From: Jim Rovira <jrovira@drew.edu>
Date: Fri Apr 18 2003 - 09:32:27 EDT

I don't think the "Bush is dumb" phenomena arises from a mass delusion
of some sort, but rather from the felt need of all people at all times
in almost all circumstances to say the obvious when, of course, it's the
obvious that needs least saying.

That being said, I tend to think there are different kinds of
intelligence. Bush seems to lack verbal intelligence, which I think
probably reflects upon his performance in school and certainly upon the
beautiful way the English language has grown since he's been publicly
speaking -- just think, if it wasn't for Bush's speech to the CIA in
2002, we wouldn't have the word "misunderestimate."

I don't know that Bush isn't fairly intelligent in other ways, though.
Call me naive, if you like -- I probably deserve it -- but there's a
part of me that wants to think that for someone to get this far, he had
to have some positive personal quality going for him.

In the 2000 Presidential debates, it was him and Gore and no one else,
and Bush walked away doing much better than everyone expected because he
used his stupidity as a rather charming, anti-intellectual asset. Just
think about the hostility you see toward academics generally. Bush
played on that facet of American culture to his benefit and Gore's
loss. In addition, he nearly evenly split the popular vote when the
odds were against him. He was running against an incumbent VP at the
end of a long period of economic recovery.

Takes smarts of some kind to do that. Maybe not so much intelligence
as...cunning?

Jim

Scottie Bowman wrote:

> I don't mind it too much when people dismiss Dubya
> as comically stupid. The names & statues can be seen
> everywhere of men who, in their day, were similarly
> dismissed as mere embarrassments. (One of them currently
> sitting plonked in the Lincoln Memorial & another leaning
> on his cane in Parliament Square.)
>
> What gets me is the serene assumption that such a judgment
> somehow identifies the individual making it as his intellectual
> superior.
>
> On this side of the Atlantic - & evidently among your own
> right-thinkers - the view is almost universal. Yet doesn't
> that very universality make for a certain unease? Most
> of the people are wrong, after all, most of the time.
> If I were to observe a vast field packed with sheep,
> all bleating the same smug message, I think I'd pause
> before raising my own little furry snout to swell their chorus.
>
> Scottie B.

-
* Unsubscribing? Mail majordomo@roughdraft.org with the message
* UNSUBSCRIBE BANANAFISH
Received on Fri Apr 18 09:32:12 2003

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Aug 10 2003 - 21:59:30 EDT