Re: an arteest

No, the point is, I'm not defending Clinton, I'm saying GWB's behavior was
criminally negligent
tina

>Point is it was sheer luck the casualties were so low. The vans were still
>moved into place and successfully detonated. More vans, better
>placement...the building may have come down.
>
>No problem with attacking GWB, but let's make productive and intelligent
>attacks. Saying Clinton may have stopped 9/11 is absolutely incredible. He
>didn't stop the attacks, obviously, that took place during his
>administration and committed quite a few blunders.
>
>Your original statement was that Clinton "staved off huge attacks like 9/11
>by holding regular meetings." That's factually incorrect. We were all
>just very lucky the attacks staged under Clinton were relatively
>ineffectual.
>
>Jim
>
>tina carson wrote:
>
>>ah, yes, and what, 3 casualties?
>>"still respectfully disagreeing & actively attacking GWB" tina
>>
>>>'Scuse me, Tina, but the WTC was attacked during the Clinton Admin, and
>>>attacked
>>>successfully.
>>
>>
>
>-
>* Unsubscribing? Mail majordomo@roughdraft.org with the message
>* UNSUBSCRIBE BANANAFISH

_________________________________________________________________
Protect your PC - get McAfee.com VirusScan Online
http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963

-
* Unsubscribing? Mail majordomo@roughdraft.org with the message
* UNSUBSCRIBE BANANAFISH
Received on Tue Apr 22 15:01:09 2003