> So, *in this case*, you see no sin in merging ficticious roles with psyches > from the here and now? You think about it. (I decided to withhold the damning > exclamation mark.) > Steve Acting is a very, very different business to writing. For example, Gwyneth Paltrow is unlikely to ever play an ass kicking murderous commando. Likewise, Arnold Schwartznegger is not going to play the grown up Will Hunting in `Good Will Hunting II'. I've been in the acting rat race; done the casting agent shit and there's no pretty way of putting it. It's a meat market. You do get judged totally on your looks. If you are already famous and have a set `persona' predescribed for you by the media, you are most likely going to get typecast in those sort of roles - i.e. Gwyneth is going to be playing a lot of sweet love interests and Arnie will be blasting those baddies for a while yet before embarking upon that series of Kafka adaptations I know he's been dying to do (: Like I said, it's an entirely different ballgame, and with someone like Courtney Love especially, it is almost impossible to separate her public persona from any role she is going to play (e.g. Althea Flynt) I wish it wasn't so myself, but it is. It's impossible in many cases to separate an actor from their role (e.g. how many times is Jack Nicholson gonna get away with playing @#$% Jack Nicholson in every role he gets ???). An actor always has to put a little of themselves into a role, be it as little as the character looks exactly like them, or like your Arnies and suchlike, they just play themselves over and over again .So yes, a whole different set of rules apply here and I think it's fair, even imperative, to say that in the case of an actor there is an unavoidable interaction between fictional and real persona. Camille verona_beach@geocities.com ______________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com