Hey, this here is my first post on this mailing list. I must say that i have'nt actually read alot, i just figured that it would always be there on those nights when i'm online with nothing to do. I'm here to ask a question about The Catcher in the Rye. i just read it in my junior english class. I was then assigned a dumb ass paper. Instead of having the class write an actuall essay on two of the books we had read, our teacher told us to simply write an outline of the basic thoughts that would go into a literary analysis. This severly impaired my ability to get my points across. I decided to compare the journeys of Guy Montag (Farenheit 451) and Holden. Which brings me to my questions. My teacher shot down every idea i had about holden, but she praised pretty much all i had to say about Guy. I was wondering if i could get some insight, from the people who know Holden, as to whether my ideas about his journey are correct. Here's the paper, and her corrections and flames are at the end with my thoughts. Please bare in mind that I am only in 11th grade and i realize you'r almost all in college. It may not be the most intelligent paper you've ever read. (you may want to maximise this window to get all the tabs right) *********************************************************************** Caulfield Compared to Montag Living in realities that can’t supply them with the fulfillment they need, both Holden Caulfield and Guy Montag travel strenuous roads to find some sort of truth and escape. I. Both Holden and Guy were assimilated into society’s system before they realized that it can’t provide them with sufficient fulfillment. A. Holden was just another boy in an all boy school, Pencey. He was a decent student, did well in English. He had had some previous problems, but then again, so had everyone else. B. Guy was the epitome of a model citizen. He was a law enforcement official, a Fireman. He was proud, and seemingly content. II. Both Holden and Guy realized, in one way or another, that the roads they lead would not take them where they wanted to go, and thus left them to search for something more. A. At first Holden’s grades started to go down, and he was kicked out. Then the incident with Stradlater made him realize that he needed some time to think to himself before he went home. B. Guy was first hit with a little bit of sense when he got to know Clarisse. Then he was finally set loose when he stole some magazines and books from a house. III. Both Holden and Guy had something that made them feel secure, and as if they are doing the right thing, when they knew they were going against all that they should have. A. At the beginning of Holden’s journey he has a considerable amount of money. When his journey comes to an end he runs out, even has to borrow some from his little sister. The money gave him the security to go on for the few days he took to himself. B. Guy would have never quit his job, or broken the law until he found books. They gave him the security and will to go on breaking the law. IV. Along the way both Holden and Guy run into the same types of people that severely annoy them. A. The people that really annoy Holden are the seemingly mindless, and ignorant. When people don’t see it just his way he gets angry with them and assumes they are phony. He is not always correct, and he admits this at the end. B. The only time Guy ever really seems to get mad is when Millie and all her friends don’t listen to him when he reads them poetry. They just don’t listen to him, much less understand what he was reading. What annoyed him was the fact that they were too mindless to understand V. Both found fulfillment with the help they received form the already enlightened. A. Holden gets some really good help from Mr. Antolini. Mr. Antolini has a long and deep conversation with Holden, and while he is very sleepy, he listens and learns. B. Guy gets help from Granger. Granger already knows what is going on, he is just to cowardly to do anything about it. He helps Guy take care of the Chief and tells him where he can go to get away from society. Guy follows the advice,and just in time before the city and all civilization blows up. Corrections: *First, she stated at the begining of the paper that "your thought process at guy is strong. thougts on holden, however, seem vague and random" My thought is that her thought process at guy is strong, and her thoughts on holden are random. from the way she attemted to teach this book, she never really seemed to completely understand the improtant lessons, and ideas. *Next was one of two good comments. she said my thesis was "well said." Whatever.... *Next she underlined the words "decent student" in the very first concrete detail. I admit that i'm not sure he was a "decent student." But she missed the point, which i was not able to completely portray due to the constrictions of this assignment. The point was that he was in fact assimilated into society's system, he was just another kid. *Then under the concrete detail that immediatly followed she told me to "remember, i said if you can have a C/D (concrete detail), you should! you can here!" That statement for Guy could not have gotten any more concrete, if you ask me. Seriously, i dont' know what the fuck she's talkin about with that quote. Plus, i was following one of the outline skeletons she had given us, i would have broken the uniformity of the outline, if i had put another concrete detail in there. *Next was her attack on the very next statement i had about holden. she stated "His grades were already low. What about Allies death and that effect on him?" I thought about mentioning Allie's death, which she was rather obsessed with when lecturing. I thought about it because that and the incident with stratlater kinda go hand in hand since holden got really violent in both situations. But it did'nt directly effect his leaving for a few days. And i also, if not constrained to one sentence, would have mentioned the numerous other reasons for his leaving for a few days. My main point, once again is that she missed the point. Which was that holden was finally completely fed up, and due to the circumstances, left, because he could. *Next was the correction that literally left a pain in my stomach. Once again it was aimed at my next thought on Holden. she said "this seems inconsequential to me!" Now this statement that i made about holden is probably the mose insightfull thing i had ever put into a paper that i came up with. And it is not bullshit, i know this to be true, and not even you guys can sway me from believing that Holden's fluxuating finances had almost complete control of his few days in New York. They gave him the security to do it, and he always kept the reader updated on how much money he had. And if you die-hards recall, holden started balling when, toward the end of his journey, Phoebe offered him money that he needed. There could be many reasons why he started crying here. He could have just felt guilty that he was taking money from his little sister. He might have just realized what an ass he had been for that last few days, and how it is now costing his little sister. *Next she simply put a "yes" next to the concrete detail on Guy under the 3rd topic sentence. This actually confused me. If that statement at guy was good, but the one for Holden was bad, then i should'nt have even made that comparison between the two. So i don't know what she wanted there. *Her next comment was aimed at the last 4 concrete details. She said "keep these to one sentence. This is why i wanted to write a full on essay, instead of an outline. *Her last comment was aimed at my Mr Antolini statement. She aske me "you really think so? Mr. A fondles him! and he runs!" This is how i know that my teacher gained nothing and understood nothing important that this book had to say. Mr Antolini knows what the fuck he's talkin about. I'm mainly refering to the quote that he gave holden, and his assesment of holden's state. The quote was something along the lines of "Immature men want to fight, and mature men are humble." (sorry, i just masacered the most important quote in the book) And my thoughts on Mr. Antolini fondling Holden are that even the best advice can come from fucked up individuals. And i think that perverts why high on Holdens list of people he hates. I think the whole scene with Mr. Antolini was the most openly writen part. I can't really explain it, but it seemed that Salinger was really pouring his guts. And then to make up for that, he shocked and sickened you with the whole, uncomfortable, fondling scene. I cant really put this to words, its just something you have to know, and feel. ********************************************************************** So thats it. If anyone can, please give me your comments on both my paper, and my teachers comments. Tell me if i'm just fucked up, and cant see it. Thanx for reading Patrick