Here I come again in Robbie's wake, swinging my bell
& my censer - or whatever it is that acolytes swing.
I won't presume to intrude in the dialogue between
himself & Jim - which leaves me, in its biblical erudition,
far behind. (While continuing to command my limping,
short of breath, attention.)
Except.
To express my drop-jawed astonishment that Fr Rovira
sees a rich vocabulary as one of the indicators of literary
mastery. I should have thought it was just as often the mark
of the essentially ungifted hoping to compensate his inadequacy
through long night hours tucked up with Increase-Your-Word-Power.
I realise minimalism is no longer flavour of the year but I still
feel the commanding writer achieves his condensed power through
self-imposed restraints - be these the observance of strict
poetic forms, or the deliberate limitation of his vocabulary to
the 'plain' words ... or whatever.
(One of my several complaints about Salinger is his scatter-gun
use of picturesque, but not precisely apposite, words.)
'Simple' words have wide - & so, one might think, inexact -
connotations. We geniuses, though, know how to structure
the context of their use in such a way as to lend them
the uniqueness & power denied the ten dollar items.
Scottie B.
-
* Unsubscribing? Mail majordomo@roughdraft.org with the message
* UNSUBSCRIBE BANANAFISH
Received on Tue Aug 5 05:01:52 2003
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Oct 16 2003 - 00:28:13 EDT