Re: teddy, at ten, is seymour at thirty.

From: James Rovira <jrovira@drew.edu>
Date: Wed Aug 27 2003 - 15:39:48 EDT

I wouldn't even draw the line at fiction writing -- different methods
produce different results no matter what the form, all of which can be
valuable for different purposes. That's part of what Michael was saying
about a historical or chronological approach -- it was too limiting. By
itself, perhaps, but in addition to others, it helps.

Jim

Yocum Daniel GS 21 CES/CEOE wrote:

>I reread it Jim, I couldn't find one word that was written off, I'll check
>under my desk, hold on....nope just some ghost turds but nothing off
>written, you should check the pants you were wearing yesterday maybe it will
>show up there. Of course each has its place but when it comes to fiction
>one is more appropriate, that is probably where it is, I was using it as a
>book marker in Kafka Under the Big Tent.
>Daniel
>
>
>

-
* Unsubscribing? Mail majordomo@roughdraft.org with the message
* UNSUBSCRIBE BANANAFISH
Received on Wed Aug 27 15:39:51 2003

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Oct 16 2003 - 00:28:17 EDT