> Several times in this story, Buddy had to clarify whether he was > addressing me, the reader, or himself, the writer. And at some > points, it seemed as if the writer was as baffled by what was written > as was the reader. Now *that* is an interesting point - some would say that that is what Salinger has been doing for the latter half (i.e. Post Hapworth) segment of his career - talking to himself ... It's very devious though somehow. Taking us on this incredibly personal (seeming) journey and then going `Well - bye!' (: ... > But it's the teasing (I'll call it Salinger's) that clues me in that > at least some of the interplay (with all its inconsistencies) is > intentional, and that, surely, the Seymore stories are a good mix of > the autobiographical (self-exploration) and the imaginary. ... `and I'm not going to tell you what's true and what's made up, either! HA HA HA!' But that of course is where the fun lies. In interpretation. Camille verona_beach@geocities.com @ THE ARTS HOLE www.geocities.com/Hollywood/Theater/6442 THE INVERTED FOREST www.angelfire.com/pa/invertedforest