Re: a confused response to a bunch of posts

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Camille Scaysbrook: "Re: a watching brief"
• Previous message: Camille Scaysbrook: "Re: the "Maynard on Salinger" article"
• Maybe in reply to: Cheryl Cline: "a confused response to a bunch of posts"
• Next in thread: Camille Scaysbrook: "Re: a confused response to a bunch of posts"

> I don't think Emily Dickinson was even close to being ashamed.  I think
> she wanted to avoid getting her shoe stuck in an "admiring bog". 

I think JDS would be very much in accordance with her opinion on
publication as `the auction-of the mind-'

I personally am not so surprised by the pizza thing ... although I think
the newsreport that was on over here (SALINGER A BULIMIC! was the gist of
it) was a bit much. It just insults me a little to think I am one of the
small pieces of  honest, choice pepperoni that Salinger is knowingly
rejecting from his sacred stomach.

Camille 
verona_beach@geocities.com
@ THE ARTS HOLE
www.geocities.com/Hollywood/Theater/6442
THE INVERTED FOREST
www.angelfire.com/pa/invertedforest
 

• Next message: Camille Scaysbrook: "Re: a watching brief"
• Previous message: Camille Scaysbrook: "Re: the "Maynard on Salinger" article"
• Maybe in reply to: Cheryl Cline: "a confused response to a bunch of posts"
• Next in thread: Camille Scaysbrook: "Re: a confused response to a bunch of posts"