Kevin Burns wrote: > lisble (readerly)/scriptible (writerly) > Things break down here. I need to look at this more. Certainly his > stories would fall under readerly texts, to me anyway. Maybe Catcher > could be argued as falling under *writerly*. But this and eveything else > makes good classroom argument. In what sense do you see _Catcher_ as potentially a writerly text? How _Catcher_ more than "Hapworth" or _S:AI_ or _Raise High_? _Catcher_ frustrates the simpler models of narrative by refusing a tidy conclusion, and perhaps in a few other areas, as well, but even with that sort of playfulness, it still tends in the end toward the basic "life is a journey" metaphor. -- Matt Kozusko mkozusko@parallel.park.uga.edu