Re: hapworth 23??

Subject: Re: hapworth 23??
From: Will Hochman (hochman@southernct.edu)
Date: Thu Dec 20 2001 - 00:09:15 GMT

sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Next message: Will Hochman: "Re: Cachet in the Rye"
Previous message: allen beaman: "Why Glass?"
In reply to: ted vanderveldt: "Re: hapworth 23??"
Next in thread: ted vanderveldt: "Re: hapworth 23??"
Reply: Will Hochman: "Re: hapworth 23??"

>
>
>ted,
>one who believes that Seymour was sexually attracted to Muriel not Sybil
>

Ted, first of all, I was stunned by your question about how and why
"Glass" became Seymour's last name...I'm utterly clueless on that one.

I'm glad we can agree that Paul Alexander tried to explain too much
about JDS based on his sexual history and I think you're right that
Muriel did attract Seymour sexually and not Sybil. Why do you think
Seymour was attracted to Muriel? Is it because of how she looks like
Charlotte, because she honors marriage deeply, or because Seymour
doesn't see sex as holy (I suspect Salinger doesn't either--what a
mistake!) and needs someone very secular to have fun with...waddaya
think? will

-- Will Hochman

Assistant Professor of English Southern Connecticut State University 501 Crescent St, New Haven, CT 06515 203 392 5024

http://www.southernct.edu/~hochman/willz.html

- * Unsubscribing? Mail majordomo@roughdraft.org with the message * UNSUBSCRIBE BANANAFISH

Next message: Will Hochman: "Re: Cachet in the Rye"
Previous message: allen beaman: "Why Glass?"
In reply to: ted vanderveldt: "Re: hapworth 23??"
Next in thread: ted vanderveldt: "Re: hapworth 23??"
Reply: Will Hochman: "Re: hapworth 23??"

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b25 : Wed Mar 20 2002 - 09:25:42 GMT