Re: clarification

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: June Kitzman: "Re: what, exactly...?"
• Previous message: Matt Kozusko: "subjection"
• Maybe in reply to: Scottie Bowman: "clarification"

What happened to the thought "everyone is Seymore's Fat Lady" "Everyone is
the nun" Don't think "Sonny" would agree with your air-brushing

On Sun, 6 Dec 1998, Emily Friedman wrote:

> 
> >     Well now we know where we stand.
> > 
> >     It should perhaps have been made clear to him 
> >     that at the end of each month all posts by new 
> >     subscribers are reviewed by a small Watch Subcommittee 
> >     of the list. (Present members: Tim O'Connor, 
> >     Matt Kozusko, Camille Scaybrook & myself.)
> > 
> >     Our function is to ensure a sufficiently high level 
> >     of articulacy & diputatiousness.  Subscribers falling 
> >     below that level are ruthlessly airbrushed out.
> > 
> >     Scottie B.
> >      
> I hope that I am not one of these people who are "ruthlessly
> airbrushed out."
> -Liz Friedman 
> > 
> > 
> 
> _________________________________________________________
> DO YOU YAHOO!?
> Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
> 
> 

• Next message: June Kitzman: "Re: what, exactly...?"
• Previous message: Matt Kozusko: "subjection"
• Maybe in reply to: Scottie Bowman: "clarification"