> this is where the OT tags and *accurate* subject lines become so useful. > if i'm checking my mail in a hurry i can skip through all the trollop > easily, because the subject line tells me what's in the mail. for > instance, i didn't read any of the ayn rand (sp?) thread, because it > doesn't interest me at all. > > this is why i'm sending out a plea: please, please please name threads as > accurately as possible, and use the OT tag liberally. if it's not related > to salinger or his writing, put it in. if in doubt, put it in anyway. > there is no problem with off topic posting; it's something you will get in > *any* online forum. the problem is when it masquerades as on topic posting > and *decieves* you into reading it. what a terrible way to found a > relationship... > > (lover of off-topic threads, but not when they aren't labelled properly) > > :helena kim > > helena at netsoc dot tcd dot ie > 'the church is near, but the road is icy. > the bar is far, but i will walk carefully.' > - russian proverb I'll try to do that in the future, but sometimes you begin discussing a Salinger topic and you end up going way off topic unintentionally. -Liz Friedman > _________________________________________________________ DO YOU YAHOO!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com