Yes, you don't need to read criticism to understand (to a degree) and appreciate literature or art or theater or Whatever.... Yes, you can even have an opinion about it. But maybe the instructor had a different idea of the purpose of the course and it's material than you, eh? :) Jim On Fri, 11 Dec 1998 20:08:12 +1100 Camille Scaysbrook <verona_beach@geocities.com> writes: > >Matt Kozusko wrote: >> I think Jim's point was simply that a person should understand the >ideas >> or opinions he is responding to before he undertakes to critique >them. >> For instance, a person taking a course in Derrida should understand >> whatever part of Derrida is being studied before responding to it. > >But that's the point. Ostensibly, the course *wasn't* about Derrida. >It was >supposed to be about Dadaism and Surrealism and a lot of other art >movements I was interested in for the paintings themselves, not what >was >said about them. Naturally criticism is an integral part of art study, >but >it shouldn't be 100%. And I reiterate my position that you don't need >to >have read up on the criticism to interpret and appreciate a work of >art - >be it a book or a painting or whatever. > > > ___________________________________________________________________ You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail. Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com/getjuno.html or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866]