Re: Private Ryan, The Thin Line and back to Ignatius J. Reilly

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Paul Kennedy: "Re: Catchers [was RE: the longest undefended border]"
• Previous message: AntiUtopia@aol.com: "Re: Private Ryan, The Thin Line and back to Ignatius J. Reilly"
• Maybe in reply to: The Laughing Man: "Private Ryan, The Thin Line and back to Ignatius J. Reilly"

In a message dated 12/16/99 6:22:11 PM Eastern Standard Time,=20
the_laughing_man@hotmail.com writes:

>=20
>  I=E2=80=99m afraid Paul=E2=80=99s wife has better judgment than that, Jim=
bo. But,=20
thinking=20
>  about it, you=E2=80=99re could be right about that Scottie daughter thing=
. She=E2=80=99s=20
>  both nice (a daughter=E2=80=99s rebellion) and brilliant (evolutionary ef=
fect).
> =20
>  /TLM

The fields of study your wife seems to be talking about within the context o=
f=20
PS sounds pretty interesting :)

Jim

• Next message: Paul Kennedy: "Re: Catchers [was RE: the longest undefended border]"
• Previous message: AntiUtopia@aol.com: "Re: Private Ryan, The Thin Line and back to Ignatius J. Reilly"
• Maybe in reply to: The Laughing Man: "Private Ryan, The Thin Line and back to Ignatius J. Reilly"