Re: no mystery

From: Jim Rovira <>
Date: Sat Feb 01 2003 - 08:35:54 EST

heh. I can live with that....I just wish I had a reason to believe ANY
explanation. Mine. Yours. Some other one.

Heck, it could have been a misprint.


Scottie Bowman wrote:

> Why all this angst over 'grool'? It is, of course, an alternative
> spelling of 'gruel' - & reflects Salinger's nascent interest in Scotch
> cereal crops. First the rye, now the oats.
> A pair of grools are simply what they sound: two thin, watery,
> more or less inedible women.
> Scottie B.

* Unsubscribing? Mail with the message
Received on Sat Feb 1 08:35:44 2003

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Aug 10 2003 - 21:57:31 EDT