Jim is a great man for the 'if you haven't tried, don't knock it'
or the 'familiarity breeds respect' position.
But I'm not so sure.
When, in my adolescence, I first fell in love with Hemingway
& read 'Death in the Afternoon' I became obsessed with the corrida.
In due course, I'd read all the available texts & acquired a fair grasp
of the history, the technical terms, the tragic principles & so on.
I eventually attended the real thing - about a dozen of them -
& was thrilled. By suppressing, as Ernie prescribed, certain
instinctive reactions of disgust & sympathy I was able to appreciate
- you can't imagine how deeply - the whole moving metaphor
of mortality, courage, the way things are, etc, etc, etc.
But then, don't ask my how, the sun rose & I saw in its unforgiving
light just what a mindless, obscenely cruel load of bullshit, supported
by self-deluding tourist trash & native canaille, the whole shebang
actually was.
In this instance, knowledge had blinded me to the obvious.
Is it possible a more 'respectful reading' (as John so frequently
recommends) of Mein Kampf would shed the kind of light I've
so far missed on the justification for Auschwitz? And how it is,
I wonder, that in my day in Trinity the Regius Professors of Divinity
& Theology, alongwith their various lecturers & clerical hangers-on,
were just about the most unappealing, uncharitable, mutually paranoid,
vicious bunch of poison dwarves I ever encountered in my life?
I accept that Practice makes Perfect. I wonder, though, about Study.
Scottie B.
-
* Unsubscribing? Mail majordomo@roughdraft.org with the message
* UNSUBSCRIBE BANANAFISH
Received on Tue Jan 7 04:36:26 2003
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Aug 10 2003 - 21:55:39 EDT