A while back, I admitted that I didn't totally understand "The Laughing Man" and invited fellow Bananafish to kindly give their thoughts on the story. I did get a couple of responses but I'm still not really satisfied so I thought I'd raise the issue again, and also refine my statement so that it's more goal-directed. I did get the story-within-a-story concept, and saw how the demise of the Chief's relationship affected The Laughing Man's fate. What I didn't really understand was the story of the Laughing Man itself. It seemed fraught with meaning and ripe for interpretation but I couldn't make heads or tails of it. So when I said that I didn't really "get" the story, I was referring to the internal one, not the interplay between the internal and metanarrative lines of the story. Hope that clarifies it and look forward to reading your responses. Peggy