In a message dated 98-01-21 19:04:32 EST, you write: << Yet this list is devoted to someone who - with varying degrees of success - was concerned in his books to capture the idea of excellence.>> Not excellence. Purity. <<Never accept phonies, he said.>> No. His charector said that in teh (I'm leaving that typo just for you) beginning of Catcher. By the end of all the works of Salinger, we see that it is most important to love everything for what it is...if they're phony, love the flaw. Just as I love you, Scottie. Its important not to fall for them, yes...but accept them is exactly what he urged us to do. << And never be one yourself. The only thing that counts is doing your absolute, uncompromising damnedest in whatever theatre you choose to commit yourself. >> In whatever theatre you choose to commit yourself, eh? So, say, if someone wanted to discuss Salinger but they weren't an english major, they should stay at home and read a book on grammar before posting? Nay to that, my dear Mr. Bowman. I urge you, for your own sake, to please stop embarrassing yourself with your obvious attempts to look intelligent by putting others down. You may be able to spell Salinger, but that ain't worth a dicky bird if you can't understand him. -ecas