On Mon, 11 Jan 1999 LeMelon@aol.com wrote: > I don't know about anyone else here, but I am angry. I attempted to join > another mailing list the other day, and decided to get right in on the current > topic of conversation. Was I dismayed to discover that the list owner reads > all messages before they are sent to the list... and then decides if they are > WORTHY of the list! My post was refused. Granted, I may not have had the > most intellectually stimulating comment to share... but my word, doesn't the > first amendment have an opinion on this? actually, no. that's called a moderated list. they're not very common, but they're a perfectly acceptable phenomonon. some topics just need moderation. a good example of why this can be a good thing for some topics is the difference between the usenet groups soc.culture.russian, and soc.culture.russian moderated. one is filled with trolls, spam, and cross-posted rasict codswallop. the other, while it has a much lower number of posts, is full of useful, informative information. that said, i can fully understand your horror if you didn't know it was a moderated list when you subscribed. just out of curiosity, what was the topic of the list? maybe there is another list devoted to it that isn't moderated. :helena kim [ it's a long road and there's no turning back ] mailto:helena@netsoc.tcd.ie