Re: Shakespeare in Love

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Camille Scaysbrook: "Re: (ADMIN) Suggestion"
• Previous message: Camille Scaysbrook: "Answered Prayers"
• Maybe in reply to: Matt Kozusko: "Shakespeare in Love"
• Next in thread: blah b b blah: "Re: Shakespeare in Love"

Jim wrote:
> The film's only
> shortcoming was its failure to expose Gwyneth Paltrow's breasts.  

I don't know what print you saw but in the one I saw G's boobs were fully
in evidence, if only for about twenty seconds. Maybe I *did* see the
directors cut (: 

Now let me get this straight - are you saying you didn't see the movie or
are you just being a sarcastic bastard (:

PS to Matt - Yes, there were a few tobacco plantations in 1593. As Colin
Firth's character says, tobacco smoking was only a newish thing back then
but still occured. There's even a madrigal of about that time (John Dowland
I think) that goes `Tobacco, tobacco/Sing sweetly for tobacco/Tobacco is
like love/Oh love me/So you see I will prove it'

Camille
verona_beach@geocities.com
@ THE ARTS HOLE http://www.geocities.com/Hollywood/Theater/6442
@ THE INVERTED FOREST http://www.angelfire.com/pa/invertedforest

• Next message: Camille Scaysbrook: "Re: (ADMIN) Suggestion"
• Previous message: Camille Scaysbrook: "Answered Prayers"
• Maybe in reply to: Matt Kozusko: "Shakespeare in Love"
• Next in thread: blah b b blah: "Re: Shakespeare in Love"