Subject: RE: we unhappy few
ZazieZazie@hetnet.nl
Date: Mon Jul 08 2002 - 12:57:03 EDT
i would have to go against 2), really. The increased ability of young men to deliver high quality of foreplay and afterplay makes young women highly responsive to go for seconds. This increased ability must be due to increasing feminisation, i'd say. and high responsiveness for "seconds" must lead to a higher chance of births, and numbers.
PS
"Spike: Well, not exactly the St. Crispin's Day speech, was it?
Giles: We few...
Giles goes past Spike as Spike gathers up the bag of weapons.
Giles: ...we happy few.
Spike: We band of buggered.
EXIT"
Episode "The Gift" season 5
-----Original Message-----
From: "owner-bananafish@roughdraft.org" <owner-bananafish@roughdraft.org> on behalf of "Scottie Bowman" <rbowman@indigo.ie>
Sent: Sunday, July 07, 2002 10:50 AM
To: "bananafish@roughdraft.org" <bananafish@roughdraft.org>
Subject: we unhappy few
As a matter of interest, how many were we at the height
of empire? And has the decline been a steady one?
For what it's worth, I've noticed what I think is a similar
demographic shrinkage on Heming & Austen.
If we're not reproducing ourselves it can only be due to:
1) these damned vasectomies & 2) the increasing feminisation
of young men. (On any Salinger list, of course, one would
expect to find 2) even more advanced than elsewhere.)
Scottie B.
-
* Unsubscribing? Mail majordomo@roughdraft.org with the message
* UNSUBSCRIBE BANANAFISH
-
* Unsubscribing? Mail majordomo@roughdraft.org with the message
* UNSUBSCRIBE BANANAFISH
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b25 : Tue Sep 17 2002 - 16:27:01 EDT