I've been thinking about this, Kim, and while I do have an almost
instinctual aversion to censorship, I'm thinking in this case perhaps a
censorship "after the fact" may be entirely appropriate.
I think I'd like to advocate appropriate punishments for authors and
publishers who inflict bad poetry upon the world. I'm thinking a mere
fine isn't enough. Nothing short of corporeal punishment will do,
ranging from a hand slap for a bad line to week long torture culminating
in death for the worst poetry.
What do you think?
Jim
>
> now live: nowhere have i suggested that writers
> should be censored. at most, i float the idea--yes, i
> use the word stricture--that readers would benefit
> (and even writers too, to avoid possible future
> embarrassment)--that poems shouldn't be allowed in
> print until a year after their composition. i didn't
> say they shouldn't be published ever.
>
> kim
-
* Unsubscribing? Mail majordomo@roughdraft.org with the message
* UNSUBSCRIBE BANANAFISH
Received on Thu Jul 3 14:17:10 2003
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Sep 16 2003 - 00:18:35 EDT