This afternoon, John writes:
He also mentions:
"Politically-motivated interpretation..."
And implies that there other, more harmonious sorts of "debate structures" that are somehow, I suppose, not political, not about power, not enmeshed in rhetorics of desire, but harmonious because they are objective and denote a "common human experience."
So, when you argue, John, it's all political, all "about power?" There's nothing divine about the argument itself?
I don't think I want to live in your world, if you don't mind.
luke
--- "Ah, the economy! How my soul stirs at the thought of discussing it! Sit! Sit! 'Tis a beautiful day, and we have all afternoon!" - * Unsubscribing? Mail majordomo@roughdraft.org with the message * UNSUBSCRIBE BANANAFISHReceived on Sat Jul 12 15:56:21 2003
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Sep 16 2003 - 00:18:37 EDT