bad poetry?

From: Michael J ANELLO <Michael.J.Anello@state.or.us>
Date: Thu Jul 03 2003 - 14:27:06 EDT

is there such a thing as poetry that isn't bad?

i think not.
>>> jrovira@drew.edu 07/03/03 11:17AM >>>
I've been thinking about this, Kim, and while I do have an almost
instinctual aversion to censorship, I'm thinking in this case perhaps a
censorship "after the fact" may be entirely appropriate.

I think I'd like to advocate appropriate punishments for authors and
publishers who inflict bad poetry upon the world. I'm thinking a mere
fine isn't enough. Nothing short of corporeal punishment will do,
ranging from a hand slap for a bad line to week long torture culminating
in death for the worst poetry.

What do you think?

Jim

>
> now live: nowhere have i suggested that writers
> should be censored. at most, i float the idea--yes, i
> use the word stricture--that readers would benefit
> (and even writers too, to avoid possible future
> embarrassment)--that poems shouldn't be allowed in
> print until a year after their composition. i didn't
> say they shouldn't be published ever.
>
> kim

-
* Unsubscribing? Mail majordomo@roughdraft.org with the message
* UNSUBSCRIBE BANANAFISH

-
* Unsubscribing? Mail majordomo@roughdraft.org with the message
* UNSUBSCRIBE BANANAFISH
Received on Thu Jul 3 14:47:28 2003

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Sep 16 2003 - 00:18:35 EDT